Funding For Space Exploration Philosophy Essay

mount For Space Exploration Philosophy EssayJuly 20, 1969, Commander Neil Armstrong takes the first steps on the moon about. All it took was clxx billion dollars in todays money to stray a man on the moon. Mankind does not neediness to explore further than the moon. Neil Armstrong once said This is one small step for man, one giant ricochet for mankind. Forget giant leaps for mankind, NASA is a giant machine for spending money. This fact is put uped up by the humiliating failure of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory, a $278 million package which blasted impinge on from Vandenberg air coerce (DeGroot 2). Considering the debt that America struggles with in right now, NASA and office geographic expedition is not the main priority. The United States government lend oneselfs an superabundance of capital to explore satellite berth in an attempt to come up early(a) forms of intelligent heart, they use too much tax money that plenty be put to better use, and many of the astr onauts atomic number 18 at risk due to sympathetic spaceflight.A oversized portion of tax-payer money goes to NASA so that they keister attempt to explore the unknown of space. Much of the money that NASA wastes on space exploration could be put to a much better and productive use. The United States government needs to focus on recovering their own planet before they discover separates. Money that goes to NASA causes the national debt to increase. Instead, that money should go towards paying off the debt, or even fixing problems with unemployment. Back in the 1960s, when planning to put the first man on the moon, 58% of Americans opposed spending the estimated $40 billion or an average of about $225 per person require to send a person to the moon. Only a third supported the plan (Nasa Funding n.pag.). more of the United States citizens opposed the plan because they knew that it should not be our main priority and it is a very large total of money. The citizens were exper ienceable of how all of that money could benefit the country. In 2004, President Bush presented Congress with a $2.4 trillion compute blueprint for the 2005 fiscal year (Nasa Funding n.pag.). The budget for the 2005 year is an extreme amount and there is to explore the depth of space when military man barely know their own planet. A gigantic amount of the cosmos remains undiscovered which gives no reason to worry about space. Given the knowledge that human beings dupe, there could exist absolutely nothing in space besides rocks and meteors. ground is practicable the only planet that sustains intelligent life. Scientists have searched the vast emptiness of space since the first moon arrive in the 1960s. Although, in 40 years of searching, we have detected no such signal. In 1967, we persuasion we had one, but that turned out to be the entirely natural signal of a pulsar (Murray 2). Assume that NASAs scientists stay put searching and finally reach their goal of discovering intelligent life 200 years into the future. More than $8 trillion will have gone toward that goal judging by the drastic increases of NASAs annual budget from the years 2003 to 2009 (Returning to the moon n.pag.). However, intelligent life may not even exist on other planets, so all the hard work and money will go to waste if NASA does not find any aliens. In December of 1993, NASA embarrassingly sent astronauts into orbit to repair the Hubble, which cost taxpayers and extra $629 million. collectable to this incident, NASA was put to blame for their incompetence and using billions in federal capital without account capacity (Nasa Funding n.pag.). NASA has the ability to just soak up federal funds and tax money to fix their mindless mistakes.The plans of the space program to send men into space may endanger their well-being. Earth is a perfect habitat for mankind, which gives humans no reason to leave. Margaret Haerens writes, Animals never leave a comfortable habitat for a gratin g one, unless they are forced to (Haerens 2). Haerens compares the astronauts to animals and how the astronauts should not leave Earth when they are perfectly find where they are. Space can kill humans very rapidly without a spacesuit. Astronauts willingly put themselves into space where they know if anything goes vituperate they will die instantly. Haerens also writes that, Our vertebrate ancestors did not come ashore hundreds of millions of years ago because they intractable to boldly go where no fish had gone before (Haerens 2). The author says that the washables to the moon and outer space is foolish and just because an area has never been explored does not mean that someone should explore the area, which relates back to how in nature, animals never leave a favorable environment for a poor one. The fact that the front in space negatively affects the human body reinforces why humans should not leave Earth. Scientists have discovered that prolonged weightlessness does terrible things to the bones and circulatory system. If God wanted us to a merry(p) in outer space, we wouldnt have balancing systems in our inner ears (Haerens 2). Humans have evolved and adapted to live on Earth, if humans were meant to live in space, they would have adapted to suit the harsh conditions of space. Iain Murray writes that alien life is completely unknown to the human race and humans have no idea what aliens are unresolved of. Aliens could have the potential to completely wipe humans off the face of the earth (Murray 1). If aliens actually exist, no one knows what they have the ability to do. They could be very powerful and dominate humans and imperialize the planet, Earth. Although, aliens may be able to assist humans with space travel if we ever encounter them.However, there are many reasons that support space exploration, such as the risk of mass extinction that happens on Earth forcing humans to migrate to other planets. In the case of a mass extinction, humans must fin d a plan B in order to survive. Haerens talks about the possibility that the human race has to keep from Earth to avoid a mass extinction. Possibly, in 500 million years, the sun may slowly boil the oceans and incinerate the Earth. Natural disasters are not the only possibility for a mass extinction, other pestilents such as climate change and overpopulation can also cause mass extinctions. Haerens also writes that the chances of an epidemic of such colossal size that it can cause a mass extinction are clean low. However, an asteroid of sufficient size could cause the extinction of humans as it did the dinosaurs (Haerens 3). Earth may in brief become over populated with humans therefore, the human race must find other planets to rag sure that mankind will live on. Jerry DeGroot notes that Stephen Hawking has postulated about how the human race must annex other planets to ensure mankinds long-term survival. The Earth is indeed doomed, but where will all the civilians go? When canvass Mars to Antarctica, Antarctica seems like a paradise (DeGroot 2). It seems logical to desire to colonize other planets since if the human race becomes extinct, all of mans achievements and accomplishments over time would be gone. Space travel has a high chance of happening, humans will eventually learn to harness the strength of space as the cavemen learned how to harness the energy of fire. Enthusiastic supporters of the space exploration argue that exploring outer space is the next step in human evolution. Scientists believe that the colonization of other planets, beginning with the moon, should become a long-term human goal. Scientist also argue that colonizing the moon helps humans learn how to live on Mars by learning how to live with conditions of the moon first (Returning to the Moon n.pag.). One day a devastating event will happen to the Earth and change the course of life and only space colonization can save it.Although space exploration can greatly benefit the pr ogression of mankind, it depletes a large part Americas resources and funds. Instead of humans nerve-wracking to find intelligent life, they should leave them to find us. The billions of dollars that are used each year to fund space exploration could greatly improve everyday life on planet Earth. The American government funds NASA with a plethora of money in order for them to discover the unknown of the universe and much of the funds comes from tax-payers. Also, the astronauts are exposed to the outside threats of space which put them in dangerous situations. Perhaps, one day, once Earth has achieved a utopic state, humans can fund a space program that will discover stranger beings.