Hostile Mint Case Study

grammatical case 1 Hostile peck its probably the last stick you might expect to find a hostile work environment. premiere of all, its a federal workplace. And even more surprising, its severely guarded against intrusion. But the situation inside the U. S. Mint in capital of Colorado was anything but a safe place for 71 women who brought a kick to the installations equal employment opportunity (EEO) incumbent in 2003. When the organizers of the complaint began to fear that they were the probe targets instead of the complaints, 32 of the women decided to hold back the matter to the U. S.Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Their contention The capital of Colorado Mint was a hostile work environment. These allegations were the culmination of a weigh of incidents that had occurred over a long period of time. The capital of Colorado Mint, which opened in 1863, has 414 employees, of which 93 are women. One cleaning lady who started working at the Denver Mint in 1997 said, She found the atmosphere completely hostile toward females. When she filed an EEO bestir claiming discrimination, she was retaliated against by having most of her job duties reassigned and being required to work at home.Events leading to the current complaint started in 2001, when another female employee who was inspecting a mens room for cleanliness saw a loose capital tile, removed it, and found 40 to 50 sex magazines. Some months later, this alike(p) employee was checking for rats in an attic and found a stash of pornographic magazines. both(prenominal) times she made these discoveries, she was with a male colleague. Later, she would say in a statement given to the main office of the U. S. Mint that to her knowledge no action was every taken to address the situations. some other female employee filed a claim of retaliation and sexual harassment with the facilitys EEO officer in 2000. It was 2003 before she got a hearing with the EEOC and an administrative judge comman d in favor of the Mint. However, when she filed her claims in federal court in 2005, a jury found that she worked in an environment hostile to women and awarded her $80,000. In 2001, the facilitys new superintendent held a womens forum attend by the then-director of the U. S. Mint. However, the highest-ranking woman at the Denver Mintthe administrative service chief, Beverly MandigoMilnesaid, Nothing changed. The final straw that triggered the complaint was the demotion of the mints performing EEO manager in February 2003. The month after the demotion, the 71 women filed the petition alleging a hostile work environment. An individual from the San Francisco Mint was assigned to investigate however, the women claimed that the investigation never focused on the facts, but on Milne. One of the women said, They believed that Beverly coerced everyone into file the petition. That was when 32 of the women took the matter to the EEOC.Despite the filed petition, hostile situations still c ontinued. One woman said that in 2004, a male co-worker offered to pay her for sex. Another woman said that after she returned after a short mischance leave following her husbands death in 2005, a male supervisor propositioned her. On March 31, 2006, the U. S. Mint and the female employees who had filed the social class complaint reached a proposed settlement. The terms of the settlement included a compensation of $8. 9 million for damages, fees, and costs. The joint press release of the United States Mint and Class Couns