Wednesday, December 12, 2018
'Life Magazine cover depicting India-Pakistan War Essay\r'
'The dispute over this region originated in the process of decolonization in South Asia. When the British colony of India gained its indep stopping pointence in 1947, it was partitioned into two go entities: the secular commonwealth of India and the predominantly Muslim nation of Pakistan. Pakistan was composed of two noncontiguous regions, East Pakistan and West Pakistan, marooned by Indian territory. The state of Jammu and Kashmir, which had a predominantly Muslim population but a Hindi leader, shared borders with both India and West Pakistan.\r\nThe argument over which nation would incorporate the state led to the showtime India-Pakistan fight in 1947-48 and ended with UN mediation. Jammu and Kashmir, to a fault cognize as ââ¬Å"Indian Kashmirââ¬Â or just ââ¬Å"Kashmir,ââ¬Â join the Republic of India, but the Pakistani Government proceed to believe that the majority Muslim state sincerely belonged to Pakistan. Conflict resumed again in early 1965, when Pakistan i and Indian forces clashed over disputed territory along the border in the midst of the two nations. Hostilities intensified that venerable when the Pakistani army attempted to take Kashmir by force.\r\nThe attempt to seize the state was unsuccessful, and the second India-Pakistan war reached a stalemate. This time, the international politics of the Cold War bear on the nature of the impinge. The joined States had a write up of ambivalent relations with India. During the 1950s, U. S. officials regarded Indian leadership with many caution due to Indiaââ¬â¢s involvement in the nonaligned movement, particularly its prominent role at the Bandung Conference of 1955. The get together States hoped to maintain a regional balance of power, which meant not allowing India to influence the political teaching of other states.\r\nHowever, a 1962 border conflict between India and China ended with a decisive Chinese victory, which motivated the United States and the United Kingdom to pop the question troops supplies to the Indian army. After the clash with China, India also turned to the Soviet gist for assistance, which placed some strains on U. S. -Indian relations. However, the United States also provided India with considerable suppuration assistance throughout the 1960s and 1970s. U. S. -Pakistani relations had been to a greater extent(prenominal) consistently positive.\r\nThe U. S. Government looked to Pakistan as an example of a moderate Muslim state and appreciated Pakistani assistance in holding the line against commie expansion by joining the Southeast Asia treaty Organization (SEATO) in 1954 and the Baghdad Pact (later renamed the substitution Treaty Organization, or CENTO) in 1955. Pakistanââ¬â¢s pursual in these pacts stemmed from its desire to develop its military and defensive capabilities, which were substantially weaker than those of India. Both the United States and the United Kingdom supplied arms to Pakistan in these years.\r\nAfte r Pakistani troops invaded Kashmir, India moved quickly to internationalize the regional dispute. It asked the United Nations to reprise its role in the depression India-Pakistan War and end the current conflict. The Security Council passed resoluteness 211 on September 20 calling for an end to the fighting and negotiations on the settlement of the Kashmir problem, and the United States and the United Kingdom supported the UN decision by strip off arms supplies to both belligerents. This ban affected both belligerents, but Pakistan felt the effects more keenly since it had a much weaker military in caparison to India.\r\nThe UN resolution and the halting of arms gross sales had an immediate impact. India accepted the ceasefire on September 21 and Pakistan on September 22. The ceasefire alone did not fade out the status of Kashmir, and both sides accepted the Soviet Union as a third-party mediator. Negotiations in Tashkent think in January 1966, with both sides giving up territ orial reserve claims, withdrawing their armies from the disputed territory. Nevertheless, although the Tashkent agreement achieved its short-term aims, conflict in South Asia would reignite a fewer years later.\r\n'
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment